Poppies & Propofol

Poppies & Propofol

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
Pelvic exams under anesthesia? Feds finally require written consent
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from Poppies & Propofol
Dr. Burgart pulls the curtain aside on the House of Medicine, revealing how injustice and politics impact patients—equipping you to discuss complex issues with wit, confidence, and clarity.
Over 1,000 subscribers
Already have an account? Sign in

Pelvic exams under anesthesia? Feds finally require written consent

Yes, in 2024 the Feds needed to remind hospitals of the requirement for consent for sensitive medical exams by medical students

Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA's avatar
Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA
Apr 06, 2024
5

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
Pelvic exams under anesthesia? Feds finally require written consent
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

On Monday, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a “Letter to the nation’s teaching hospitals and medical schools” to specifically address reports of people being subjected to sensitive medical exams under anesthesia without consent, especially by medical students.

“The Department is aware of media reports as well as medical and scientific literature highlighting instances where, as part of medical students’ courses of study and training, patients have been subjected to sensitive and intimate examinations – including pelvic, breast, prostate, or rectal examinations – while under anesthesia without proper informed consent being obtained prior to the examination.”

Most importantly, the reminder has financial consequences for training hospitals. Hospitals not complying with the consent requirement risk losing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements.

Poppies & Propofol is a reader-supported publication. Subscribe and never miss a post!

I have no doubt there are clinicians and administrators all over the country who are irritated that yet another form, another piece of documentation, will be required to provide patient care. Some people will claim this is government overreach, interfering with the relationship between patients and physicians.

But regulation seems to be the only remedy that works.

Despite the open discussion of unethical, unconsented vaginal exams since the early 2000s, the problem persists. The day HHS released the letter, fewer than half of US states specifically required consent for these exams, leaving clinicians and medical students to figure out for themselves what their practice would be.

By making consent a requirement, the HHS letter increases protection for patients across the US.

Photo by Anna Schvets. View from outside an operating room door, looking through a narrow window, at healthcare professionals caring for a surgical patient. The patient is not visible, they are covered in sterile surgical drapes.

Unconsented pelvic exams belie a core, lingering problem in medicine—the assumption that the patient’s opinion doesn’t need to be solicited. It is the underlying notion that doctors still know best. A belief that if a patient can’t express an opinion or remember what happened, does it really matter? The idea is that clinicians don’t have an obligation to ask permission.

No patient should ever wake up from surgery to find out that they have been violated.

While many clinicians have actively tried to move past these assumptions and aim for ethical practice, medicine changes very slowly. Government regulation can help ensure patients have access to the care they want, without suffering from body violations.

Anesthesia Ensures Compliance

Performing a sensitive medical exam on a patient who is sedated or deeply anesthetized without consent sounds a whole lot like drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA).

In January this year, Dr. Caitlin Sutton and I wrote about anesthesia as a tool to facilitate obstetric violence. Anesthesia drugs are powerful - rendering patients unconscious and unable to advocate for themselves. Once under general anesthesia, a patient won’t have any idea they have had an exam until they wake up with pelvic discomfort or until it’s disclosed later.

While patients are the primary people this practice harms, medical students are secondary victims. A 2022 study by Kaur and colleagues found that “While students regularly perform pelvic EUAs, their involvement is inconsistently disclosed to patients, causing significant distress to students and risking erosion of students' attitudes about upholding patient autonomy and informed consent.”

Mississippi Appendectomies and the History of Reproductive Injustice

When patients can’t be certain even the examinations they receive under anesthesia are consented to, what else do they need to worry about?

The US has a long history of forced or coerced sterilization - targeting Black, Latina, and Native women, poor people, and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Many of these sterilizing procedures happened while women were anesthetized.

Historical photograph of Carrie and Emma Buck (Encyclopedia Virginia)

Carrie Buck became pregnant after being raped by her foster family’s nephew. Buck v. Bell became a landmark case, allowing states to continue the forced sterilization of people with disabilities. Carrie was deemed “feebleminded and promiscuous,” and her ability to procreate was taken away as the first person to be involuntarily sterilized in Virginia’s eugenics program.

In 1961, activist Fannie Lou Hammer consented to have a growth removed from her uterus, but instead, the surgeon removed the entire uterus. Black women suffering forced sterilization at the hands of physicians was so common that she ultimately coined the term “Mississippi Appendectomy.”

Jean Whitehorse, a Navajo woman, described presenting to a hospital in pain from acute appendicitis in the 1970s. Years later, she discovered that while having a life-saving medical procedure under anesthesia, her surgeon also performed a tubal ligation. A tubal ligation is a type of permanent sterilization that prevents eggs from moving from the ovary to the uterus, preventing pregnancy. Her experience and that of many other Native women is documented in the film Amá (the Navajo word for “mother”).

More recently, an audit of California’s prison system discovered nearly 1,400 women were sterilized between 1997 and 2013. Many were not asked for their consent or were coerced into consenting.

At Your Cervix

There’s a powerful documentary about unconsented pelvic exams called At Your Cervix. The director includes interviews with survivors, students, and physicians about consent and sensitive medical exams.

Here’s the trailer ⤵️

Gynecologic Teaching Assistants

It doesn’t have to be this way. The At Your Cervix film explores ethical, consistent ways to teach students how to do pelvic exams well. Gynecologic teaching assistants (GTA) are one way to improve care.

GTAs are people who use their own bodies to teach pelvic exam skills to medical students. I had the benefit of working with a GTA when I was in medical school - even back in the mid-2000s. Having had my own bad experiences with pelvic exams while awake, I was eager to learn how to do these exams in a way that was compassionate, effective, and ethical.

Learning with an awake expert like a GTA improves teaching, helping students learn how to conduct pelvic exams that are more comfortable and trauma-informed. Students trained with GTAs, report greater confidence in performing pelvic exams than those who didn’t have access to a GTA. An anesthetized patient—even one who has consented to an exam—won’t be able to give students feedback on what’s working (and not) in their technique.

Thankfully more programs incorporate GTAs into training for students.

Thank you for reading Poppies & Propofol. This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

HHS Letter is a Good Step, But Not Enough

With the new HHS guidance, students will have more confidence that patients have consented to sensitive medical exams. However, signing a form is only an attestation of assent. Many of the women who suffered forced or coerced sterilization also signed papers, not realizing what they agreed to.

We need sensitive medical exams to be taken seriously - prioritizing the patient’s opinion above other considerations.

References:

Wilson RF. Unauthorized practice: teaching pelvic examination on women under anesthesia. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2003 Fall;58(4):217-20; discussion 221-2. PMID: 14640251.

Burgart A, Sutton C. Chemical Restraints for Obstetric Violence: Anesthesiology Professionals, Moral Courage, and the Prevention of Forced and Coerced Surgeries. Am J Bioeth. 2024 Feb;24(2):4-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2299629. Epub 2024 Jan 31. PMID: 38295250.

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).

Kaur K, Salwi S, McNew K, Kumar N, Millimet H, Ravichandran N, Tytus K, Zhang AY, Garrett Wood A, Grimm B, Fairbrother EL. Medical Student Perspectives on the Ethics of Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):1413-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 Jun 4. PMID: 35672245.

Kelly K, Wilder L, Bastin J, Lane-Cordova A, Cai B, Cook J. Utility of Gynecological Teaching Associates. Cureus. 2023 Jun 18;15(6):e40601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40601. PMID: 37469809; PMCID: PMC10353857.

Poppies & Propofol is a reader-supported publication. Subscribe and never miss a post!

Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA's avatar
Teresa's avatar
edward's avatar
ProleStories's avatar
5 Likes∙
2 Restacks
5

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
Pelvic exams under anesthesia? Feds finally require written consent
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Be a Strong Link for Immigrant Patients 🔗
Enhance the ethical care of all patients when immigration agents enter hospitals
Jan 25 • 
Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA
42

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
Be a Strong Link for Immigrant Patients 🔗
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
West Texas Measles Outbreak
One in five kindergarteners in Gaines County schools has a non-medical vaccine exemption. Low vaccination rates prime the area for the easy, natural…
Feb 9 • 
Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA
26

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
West Texas Measles Outbreak
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Dr. Christine Grady, NIH Bioethics Leader and Consent Expert, “Resassigned” in Purge
The Dismantling of NIH Bioethics Paves the Way for Unethical Research
Apr 8 • 
Alyssa Burgart, MD, MA
20

Share this post

Poppies & Propofol
Poppies & Propofol
Dr. Christine Grady, NIH Bioethics Leader and Consent Expert, “Resassigned” in Purge
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Ready for more?

© 2025 Alyssa Burgart
Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.